Valutazione dell'efficacia e della sicurezza dell'Infliximab e della Ciclosporina Orale Microemulsione (Neoral) nei pazienti con colite ulcerosa severa refrattari agli steroidi per via endovenosa. Risultati preliminari di uno studio randomizzato controllato

Background. Intravenous steroids represent the mainstay of therapy for severe attacks of Ulcerative Colitis (UC). In steroid refractory patients, both iv cyclosporine (CsA) and infliximab (IFX) are valid rescue therapies. Several studies have shown that oral microemulsion CsA (Neoral) is equivalent to iv CsA in term of safety and efficacy in UC patients. Aim. To investigate the efficacy and safety of oral microemulsion CsA vs IFX in patients with severe attack of UC, refractory to iv steroids. Material and methods. From May 2006, all consecutive pts admitted for severe UC were considered eligible. Pts were treated with iv steroid, according to the Oxford regime. After 1 week of intensive treatment, pts non responder to the therapy and not candidate to the surgery, were asked to participate to the trial. They were randomised to receive IFX 5 mg/kg or oral CsA 5 mg/kg. Results. A total of 30 patients were randomised, 17 in the IFX group and 13 in the CsA group. One month after study inclusion, 9 patients of the IFX group (53%) and 7 pts of the CsA group (54%) were in clinical remission (p=0.96), with a Powell-Tuck index ≤ 3. At the end of the follow-up, 7 pts in the IFX group (41%) vs 4 in the CsA group (31%) (p=0.35) underwent colectomy. The total cost of the IFX therapy with IFX was 8.052,84 € versus 1.106,82 €, for each patient. Conclusions. Oral microemulsion CsA and IFX seem to be equivalent in term of efficacy and safety in severe UC patients refractory to iv steroids. In patients treated with IFX the cost of therapy were significantly higher.

Alterazioni del metabolismo osseo e fratture vertebrali dopo trapianto di rene

Introduction:Persistent Hyperparathyroidism after transplantation (HPT),bone disease and vertebral fractures are an important clinical problem in renal transplant patients. Several factors such as renal osteodystrophy, immunosuppressive therapy, deficit/insufficiency Vitamin D may contribute to that.In literature are described different percentages of HPT, vertebral fractures and Osteoporosis/Osteopenia that may be due to the different therapy and to the different employ of steroid. We analyzed 90 patients who received a renal graft between 2005 e 2010. Patients and Methods: 44 male and 46 female. Average age 52,2± 10,1 years, follow-up 31,3±16,6 months, time on dialysis 37±29,6 months. Patients who had creatinine level greater than 2,5 mg/dl were excluded. Immunosuppressive therapy was based on basiliximab, steroids (1.6 to 2 mg/kg/day progressively reduced to 5 mg/day after 45 days from the transplantation) in all patients + calcineurin inhibitor+ mycophenolate mophetil/mycophenolic acid in 88,8% of patients or Everolimus± calcineurin inhibitor in the others. Patients were studied with X-ray of the spine, dual-energy-X-ray, PTH, 25(OH)VitD. Results: 41,1% had HPT; 41,1% had osteopenia at femoral neck and 36,7% at vertebral column; 16,7% had osteoporosis at femoral neck and 15,6% at vertebral column. 10 patients (11%) had vertebral fractures. Patients with normal bone mineral density, compared to those with osteoporosis/osteopenia, are more younger (average age 46,4±11,7 years vs 54.3±8,6); they have spent less time on dialysis (26,5±14,8 months vs 40,7±32,6) and they have values of 25(OH)VitD higher (22,1±7,6 ng/ml vs 17,8±8,5). Patients with vertebral fractures have values of 25(OH)VitD lowest (14,1±6,4 ng/ml vs 19,7±8,5) and they had transplant since more time (29,1±16,2 vs 48,1±8,7 months). There is a significant correlation between HPT and PTH pre transplantation; HPT and levels of VitD (p<0,05) Conclusion: Prevention of Bone disease and vertebral fractures after renal transplant includes: a)treatment before transplantation b)supplementation of vitamin D with cholecalciferol or calcidiol c)shorten the dialysis time.

Efficacia e sicurezza della profilassi anti-citomegalovirus rispetto alla strategia pre-sintomatica con valganciclovir in pazienti con trapianto di cuore trattati con everolimus o micofenolato

Il CMV è l’agente patogeno più frequente dopo trapianto (Tx) di cuore determinando sia sindromi cliniche organo specifiche sia un danno immunomediato che può determinare rigetto acuto o malattia coronarica cronica (CAV). I farmaci antivirali in profilassi appaiono superiori all’approccio pre-sintomatico nel ridurre gli eventi da CMV, ma l’effetto anti-CMV dell’everolimus (EVE) in aggiunta alla profilassi antivirale non è stato ancora analizzato. SCOPO DELLO STUDIO: analizzare l’interazione tra le strategie di profilassi antivirale e l’uso di EVE o MMF nell’incidenza di eventi CMV correlati (infezione, necessità di trattamento, malattia/sindrome) nel Tx cardiaco. MATERIALI E METODI: sono stati inclusi pazienti sottoposti a Tx cardiaco e trattati con EVE o MMF e trattamento antivirale di profilassi o pre-sintomatico. L’infezione da CMV è stata monitorata con antigenemia pp65 e PCR DNA. La malattia/sindrome da CMV è stato considerato l’endpoint principale. RISULTATI: 193 pazienti (di cui 10% D+/R-) sono stati inclusi nello studio (42 in EVE e 149 in MMF). Nel complesso, l’infezione da CMV (45% vs. 79%), la necessità di trattamento antivirale (20% vs. 53%), e la malattia/sindrome da CMV (2% vs. 15%) sono risultati significativamente più bassi nel gruppo EVE che nel gruppo MMF (tutte le P<0.01). La profilassi è più efficace nel prevenire tutti gli outcomes rispetto alla strategia pre-sintomatica nei pazienti in MMF (P 0.03), ma non nei pazienti in EVE. In particolare, i pazienti in EVE e strategia pre-sintomatica hanno meno infezioni da CMV (48 vs 70%; P=0.05), e meno malattia/sindrome da CMV (0 vs. 8%; P=0.05) rispetto ai pazienti in MMF e profilassi. CONCLUSIONI: EVE riduce significamene gli eventi correlati al CMV rispetto al MMF. Il beneficio della profilassi risulta conservato solo nei pazienti trattati con MMF mentre l’EVE sembra fornire un ulteriore protezione nel ridurre gli eventi da CMV senza necessità di un estensivo trattamento antivirale.